Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • megh
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 2

    #1

    Extracting reads from barcoded pooled samples

    Hi,

    I'll be glad to receive any comments and suggestions regarding the problem described below. Recently we have completed a small scale sequencing project using 454 FLX platform. Altogether we have 100 samples and they were pooled in row-column format in a way that each sample is present in at least two pools with unique neighboring samples. The objective was to use less number of barcodes to minimize cost and lab work. We formed 10 row pools and 10 column pools. For example: (C = column pool, R = row pool)

    C1 C2 C3 C4 C10
    R1 1 2 3 4 ..... 10
    R2 11 12 13 14 ..... 20
    R3 21 22 23 24 ..... 25
    ....
    ....
    R10 91 92 93 94 ..... 100

    So, R1 = 1,2,3,4.....,10
    C1= 1,11,21,...,91 etc.

    We have used 10 barcodes for both column and row pools. Each sample is present in two pools, for example sample 1 is present in C1 and R1. The sequencing run was with fair quality 454 reads. Our objective is to extract the reads specific to each sample and assemble it. Now we find it difficult to de-convolute. In the ideal case we expected when assemble the reads from pools R1 and C1 and match the contigs against each other we would get the contig/s specific to the common sample (sample 1 in this case) between them.

    Any thoughts how we can trace the reads specific to a particular sample and assemble it in the above mentioned scenario?

    Thanks.
  • vaibhav
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 2

    #2
    try some 454 sequencing analysis tool

    Hi megh,
    We also have the similar data, and in our case we had the unique sequence attached to each sample through which we could easily separate from the pool using a small perl script.
    Another way of doing it is using 454 analysis tool. We used Roche analysis softwares and there was option in the software to separate the samples from the pools.
    Try and see if it can work you also
    All the best ..

    Thanks and regards

    Vaibhav Jain
    Research scholar
    IGIB, Delhi, India

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...