Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kotoro
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 31

    advice on methods for comparison

    I am trying to compare quality of paraffin embedded samples against frozen samples. (Cancer tissue samples and normal tissue samples from human tumors). I would assume one of the things to do would be a comparison of expression given by sequencing runs on both samples. What are the best tools/methods to use for this comparison and are there any other experimental methods or data that I should be using as well?

    I have been trying to learn how to use cufflinks but I'm not so sure cufflinks is the right way to go for this. (Even if it is, what to do with the output to get a useful answer as to whether the samples are good quality becomes another question entirely).

    So, I am in need of some good direction and advice.
    Last edited by Kotoro; 07-01-2011, 01:48 PM.
  • Kotoro
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 31

    #2
    I'm guessing the delay in response is due to this not being a very simple answer. (I had thought so.)

    Still slogging through the data, trying to think of way to effectively compare the sequencing runs (and th samples themselves, regardless of sequencing.)

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
      by SEQadmin2



      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
      ...
      07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
    0 responses
    30 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    34 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...