Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kennels
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 149

    removing duplicates in small (si)RNA data

    Hello,

    I hopefully have found most of the threads regarding duplicate removal in this forum.
    (e.g. http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...uplicate+reads)

    I am wondering if anyone has some input regarding this topic on small RNA data sets - how large an effect (if any) does real PCR duplicates have on real sRNA reads?
    An sRNA read distribution profile typically displays many reads originating from an exact 5' position, which can be observed as 'hotspots' of read stacks across a reference.

    I am analyzing miRNA/siRNA distribution profiles on viral genomes and hpRNAs, so the read depth is typically very high in very localized hotspots, but I am wondering if duplicates should be considered in my analysis, and if so, how does one distinguish real from duplicates reads?

    thanks
  • ron128
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 38

    #2
    Hello. There is no real way to differentiate between pcr duplicates and "real" reads. The only way out is if you use tags in the sample preparation. We had tried something similar to what kcarr has suggested, and were able to differentiate between the two.

    Duplicates IMHO would not matter much in your case unless you are studying rnaseq data or analysing expression profiles.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...