Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • libiyagirl
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 27

    driver identification using CHASM in cancer

    Hello,

    I am trying to run CHASM "BuildClassifier" command. But it always return error saying:

    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "<string>", line 31, in <module>
    File "/home/andywong86/pyinstaller-1.4/iu.py", line 436, in importHook
    File "/home/andywong86/pyinstaller-1.4/iu.py", line 521, in doimport
    File "./build/pyi.linux2/BuildClassifier/outPYZ1.pyz/util.makemuts", line 23, in <module>
    File "./build/pyi.linux2/BuildClassifier/outPYZ1.pyz/util.genes", line 59, in __init__
    IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: './ClassifierPack/refseq.info'

    I don't know what's happening. Anyone used CHASM before?

    Thank you very much!
  • nyk
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 1

    #2
    I assume you have to set the CHASMDIR evironment variable, because I got a similar error when I did not do that, if I remember correctly.
    Because I'm going to use CHASM from a script, I add the setting of that variable before the BuildClassifier command. Like this:
    CHASMDIR=/opt/CHASM /opt/CHASM/BuildClassifier -m /opt/CHASM/ClassifierPack/contexts/BR.context -i /opt/CHASM/ClassifierPack/calibrate.tmps -o breast_cancer

    I also have a question:
    Is it the idea to use the "calibrate" set of mutations for building the classifier, like I did in the above command? And then use RunChasm on the mutation-list of cancer samples I want to test?
    Or should the model be calibrated on the *same* set of mutations I will use RunChasm on?
    Last edited by nyk; 09-28-2011, 02:08 PM.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...