Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • history_of_robots
    Junior Member
    • May 2011
    • 9

    Bowtie optional fields in SAM question

    Hello,

    I am unsure of how to interpret XM:i:1 in SAM as produced by Bowtie. In Bowtie manual (http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/ma...-bowtie-output) it says:

    "XM:i:<N> For a read with no reported alignments, <N> is 0 if the read had no alignments. If -m was specified and the read's alignments were supressed because the -m ceiling was exceeded, <N> equals the -m ceiling + 1, to indicate that there were at least that many valid alignments (but all were suppressed)."

    I am running bowtie with -m 1. I assume that with this option I suppress reporting the alignments for reads that are aligned more than once. It seems to me, from the description above, that reads suppressed due to -m 1 should have <N> equal to 3 (ceiling '2' plus '1'). However, I can only see XM:i:0 or XM:i:1 in the output file.

    Can anybody please explain me the logic of the XM:i:<N> field? Thanks very much.
    "Let’s start with the three fundamental Rules of Robotics...."
  • vsravi
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 2

    #2
    same issue here

    I see the same thing in my mappings. Could you find out how to interpret these numbers?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...