Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robby
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 68

    BWA error

    Hello everyone,

    I used BWA for mapping and received the following error message:
    "Parse error at line 34: sequence and quality are inconsistent"
    It is a paired end run. The mapping of forward and reverse reads worked without problems. The error message occurs when I use sampe. What could be the mistake? I am gratefull for any ideas.

    Thanks Robby
  • maubp
    Peter (Biopython etc)
    • Jul 2009
    • 1544

    #2
    Have you looked at the input FASTQ file, especially at the area around line 34?

    Data can get corrupted in transfer...

    Comment

    • Richard Finney
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 701

      #3
      What are the commands you use?
      Is it in the "aln" program or the subsequent "sampe" program?
      Did the aln finish?
      Is there junk in the intermediate "sai" file? ( run "strings filename.sai | less" and glance for readable error messages). It's easy to accidentally send stderr to stdout in the aln phase and use this to pump into "sampe". bwa is merciless in expecting correct input.

      Comment

      • Robby
        Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 68

        #4
        Thanks a lot for your answers.

        I checked the fastq-file, but couldn't see any strange data. But I am not really sure, what I have to check exactly. So I had just a look, if the sequence length is the same as the quality scores and if the line breaks are correct. But everything seems to be OK. The onliest difference to other fastq-files is, that in the third line of each sequence is just a "+" instead of "+" and sequence name. But I thought that this is maybe due to the new Illumina format. Does anyone have more information regarding that line?

        The error message occurs in the "sampe" program. The "aln program finished without any error message. I had a look into the sai-files, but I don't understand the output. But at least I couldn't find an error message in these files and the files have the expected size.

        This was the first run with the new Illumina v3 chemistry and the new fastq format (i.e. Sanger quality scores). Do I have to change in that case anything?

        I used the following commands:
        bwa aln -I -l 35 ref.fasta reads1.fastq.gz > align1.sai
        bwa aln -I -l 35 ref.fasta reads2.fastq.gz > align2.sai
        bwa sampe ref.fasta align1.sai align2.sai reads1.fastq.gz reads2.fastq.gz > mapping.sam

        I tried the aln-commands without the -I option (for Illumina 1.3+) as well, but received the same error message.

        Comment

        • gaffa
          Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 82

          #5
          Originally posted by Robby View Post
          I checked the fastq-file, but couldn't see any strange data. But I am not really sure, what I have to check exactly. So I had just a look, if the sequence length is the same as the quality scores and if the line breaks are correct. But everything seems to be OK. The onliest difference to other fastq-files is, that in the third line of each sequence is just a "+" instead of "+" and sequence name. But I thought that this is maybe due to the new Illumina format. Does anyone have more information regarding that line?
          That's fine, the read name is not needed at the third line, just a "+" is valid fastq and recognized by BWA.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          53 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...