Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fpauler
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 2

    Multi-read problem with bowtie and cufflinks

    Hi,

    I am trying to use the sorted BAM files (samtools) from bowtie alignments with cuffdiff.

    Although I allow bowtie to report multiple matching reads cuffdiff reports:
    Multi-Reads: 0

    The same cuffdiff parameters used for a TopHat alignment of the same data does show Multi-Reads!

    Any ideas what could be the problem?

    Thanks a lot!
  • chlamy18
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 2

    #2
    Did you find the solution.

    I had the same problem as you posted last year on this forum.
    I wonder if you found the solution how to deal with the multi-read in bam file generated by Bowtie.
    Thanks.

    Comment

    • fpauler
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 2

      #3
      There seem to be some people interested as this post has 434 views but no replies.

      So I investigated the matter and found the following:
      Cuffdiff needs a certain nomenclature for multi-reads in the BAM file. This nomenclature is non-standard (at least for bowtie alone) but done by TopHat automatically. What TopHat basically does is to connect the multireads and make the analysis for cufflinks easier.

      At the moment I use TopHat with a GTF file for my reference transcripts and use this output for cufflinks. This is quite quick and does the job.

      I wished the tuxedo-suite developers cared more for their users and give this information somewhere ...

      hope this helps,

      Comment

      • chlamy18
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 2

        #4
        Thanks~

        Thank you very much for the information.
        Recently launched Bowtie2 generates much sensitive alignment compared to the previous Bowtie. So, I tried to avoid using Tophat because it still uses old Bowtie for its process.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        45 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        105 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        125 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...