We are analyzing illumina 75bp paired-end RNA-seq data. For mapping, what are the key differences between TopHat and Illumina's eland-CASAVA pipeline for RNA-seq data?
-
-
i would appreciate if someone could give an appropriate answer!
Thanks in advance! -
I heard from a talk given by Illumina, casava is good for reads length <= 50.Comment
-
The Illumina pipeline will only look for known splice junctions, while TopHat can (at least in theory) find novel splice junctions.Comment
-
Hi kopi-o,Originally posted by kopi-o View Post
Thanks for highlighting that difference.
One other difference could be the no. of basepairs that the algorithm expects as the 'seed' in order to generate accurate alignments. For illumina-eland, I know it is 32bp, but not sure what seed length does TopHat expect.Comment
-
Hi kopi-o,
Thanks for highlighting the difference on splice junction prediction between Illumina-Eland and TopHat.Comment
-
NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...Yesterday, 06:46 AM -
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
Comment