Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • megh
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 2

    Comparing and merging genome assemblies

    Hi,

    We have recently completed the de-novo assembly of a eukaryotic genome. The genome size is ~3.1GB.
    We used two different assembly platforms/pipelines and got ~2.0GB and ~2.8GB scaffolds respectively.

    I look for your suggestions in the following areas:

    1) What would be the most suitable way to compare the similarity and/or differences between two assemblies?

    2) Any suitable assembly merger? The objective of question (1) is to merge them to make it larger.
    [ I could not install GAM (Genome Assembly Merger) on my MAC OSX 10.6 ]

    3) Any suitable and open-source pipeline for annotation?

    Regards.
  • colindaven
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 417

    #2
    1) Blast is nice, visualised with Circos. Perhaps try circoletto ?

    2) Apparently SSPACE is quite good, haven't tried it yet myself.

    Comment

    • sphil
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 192

      #3
      Actually there are some genome aligners. They differ in speed, amount of genomes which can be aligned and spped. For a first sigh you can use:

      Whole genome aligner:
      MUMer
      LAGAN
      AVID (not open source)

      or Multi Genome aligner:
      MGA (not open source)
      MLAGAN
      DIALIGN(not open source)

      there a a plenty more tools...

      Even if there are not all open source, they are all free to use (when I'm right..).

      hope that helps

      Comment

      • boetsie
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 245

        #4
        2) Do not use SSPACE to merge assemblies, SSPACE is for scaffolding or for contig extension. Have a look at this thread for possible assembly mergers;
        Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc


        3) I think Augustus is a good annotation tool for eurkaryotic genomes: http://augustus.gobics.de/ Haven't used it myself though.

        Comment

        • vyahhi
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 4

          #5
          You can use QUAST (QUality ASsesment Tool for Genome Assembly) to compare multiple genome assemblies:

          Download QUAST for free. Quality Assessment Tool for Genome Assemblies. QUAST performs fast and convenient quality evaluation and comparison of genome assemblies. It is maintained by the Gurevich lab at HIPS (https://helmholtz-hips.de/en/hmsb).

          http://http://quast.bioinf.spbau.ru (QUAST server, beta)

          Comment

          • neu
            Junior Member
            • Jul 2014
            • 3

            #6
            Hi all,
            me working with transcriptome data. i have two transcriptomes of superior and inferior traits of a plant. what i did is that i assembled my transcriptomes to a reference genome. now i want to compare the reference assembly to find the difference, ie to find the difference between the inferior and superior one and if possible to find the genes responsible for the quality. i would also like to know about the expression. my lab has CLC bio, and would appreciate any suggestions to my query which make use of CLC bio

            Thank You

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              Today, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            30 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...