Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robby
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 68

    Annovar -- annotation without filter?

    Hello everyone,

    I would like to annotate my SNPs. After annotation I would like to have a table with additional information like position (exon, intron, UTR,...), dbSNP-ID, SIFT/PolyPhen/PhyloP-score, gene (for exonic SNPs),....

    I tried to use Annovar for that. But unfortunally I received two tables after each step and I couldn't use these tables for the next step, so that it wasn't possible to have for example the position/region together with the SIFT-score in one table or i.e. the Sift- and Polyphen-score in one table.

    Is there any possiblity to add just the information to the table and use the resulting table for the next step?

    Thanks for your help
  • Jorge Amigo
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 11

    #2
    although rudimentary, you could use the summarize_annovar.pl script which is included in the ANNOVAR's distribution in order to have several annotations in the same table. since it loads several annotations tables into the memory you'll need a few GBs of RAM available on your computer (for hg18 annotation I remember I needed ~5GB). it is not very customizable, but it can maybe suit your needs as it did with ours. you can read a little more about the script on the ANNOVAR's Accessory Programs section.

    Comment

    • Robby
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 68

      #3
      thanks. that helps me a lot.

      But I have some new questions:
      I would like to use the new 1000G data (May 2011), but the script just accepts the old one (Nov 2010). Is there any possibility to change that?

      Does anyone know, how annovar handels SNPs/Indels belonging to different isoforms/genes? Can I find just the result of one isoform in that case or are there different lines for each hit?

      Comment

      • Jorge Amigo
        Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 11

        #4
        for the first question (using 1000g2011may data instead of 1000g2010nov) I would suggest to do what we did and worked: edit the summarize_annovar.pl script and change all "1000g2010nov" occurrences for "1000g2011may".

        for the second question I must also require help, since I believe that each SNP belonging to different isoforms is written on a separate line, but I haven't investigated it yet.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...