Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vebaev
    Senior Res.
    • Oct 2008
    • 112

    #1

    SNP or error in miRNA read?

    Hi,
    I need advise since I'm not aware of SNPs area...

    I observe 2 reads matching a mature miRNA which are most abundant ones:
    1) first is perfect match with the mature with 200K counts
    2) secong have 1 mismatch but have double read counts (400K) - more abundant than the perfect match!

    I think this cannot be error since it is sequenced 400K times with the same mistmach? or I'm wrong?

    Can I conclude that this can be SNP in the the miRNA or no?

    Thanks
    ------------
    SMART - bioinfo.uni-plovdiv.bg
  • eslondon
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 21

    #2
    There are several potential explanations for this type of resuts:

    1)Post-transcriptional editing. This is a mechanism by which the actual microRNA sequence is edited after transcription. Initially it was thought to be very prevalent, but then later it was observed that often what is considered editing is actually a cross-mapping artifact.

    2)Cross-mapping artifacts. Small RNAs such as micro-RNAs, Y RNAs and other small RNAs are often very similar to each other, with families of microRNAs sharing very similar sequence. Sometimes one base pair change is enough to switch from the sequence of a Y RNA to that of a micro-RNA.

    These issues, as well as good additional references, are discussed in depth in this article:



    So before jumping to conclusions you have to make sure that your 600K reads, once filtired for high quality base calls and mapped to the whole genome, are truly located in the best possible mapping location.

    best regards
    --------------------------------------
    Elia Stupka
    Co-Director and Head of Unit
    Center for Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics
    San Raffaele Scientific Institute
    Via Olgettina 58
    20132 Milano
    Italy
    ---------------------------------------

    Comment

    • vebaev
      Senior Res.
      • Oct 2008
      • 112

      #3
      Thanks eslondon,
      I will look into that paper more deeply.
      ------------
      SMART - bioinfo.uni-plovdiv.bg

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...