Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shuang
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 100

    How to Improve Newbler Assembly

    I'm assembling 454 of a 160 KB fragment containing highly repeated sequences. This fragment is derived majorly from a centimere region.

    I'm using Newbler to assemble this 454 sequencing data. I've played different combinations of 'min overlap length’ (40, 35) and ‘min overlap identity’ (90, 95, 98). By far, I only can get 22-25 contigs and 20kb-21kb N50.

    I'm eager to know what other parameters and numbers could improve the assembly outcome.
  • flxlex
    Moderator
    • Nov 2008
    • 412

    #2
    I don't think tweaking newbler parameters is going to help much. Perhaps other programs (e.g. celera, mira, clcbio) could do a better job. But you will gain the most from more data, in particular paired end (mater pair) reads, or the longer 454 reads that just became available or of course PacBio reads...).

    Comment

    • Kirstin
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 4

      #3
      How did you modify the minimum identity? i'm trying to do that in GS runMapping, but i'm finding that what I think should do that "-mi <percentage>" doesn't make any difference if I change the percentage? Even if I pick "-mi 99" it seems to include reads which are a much lower ID?

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...