Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • emilyjia2000
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 59

    #1

    comparison between two samples in chip-seq

    Hello,

    I would like to do the comparison between two samples in chip-seq data, to see the similarity or difference between these two samples. I used MACS to detect the peak calling, I don't know how to do the comparison, any input would be appreciated.

    Thanks,
  • emilyjia2000
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 59

    #2
    I might not elucidate the fact clearly. After the peak calling, I could get the overlaps between the peak regions between two different samples (from different cell lines), but this could not demonstrate the similarity or difference statistically.

    Does anybody know any tools that could help on solving this?
    Is there any way to check the correlation between two samples?

    Thanks,

    Comment

    • vanbug
      Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 11

      #3
      Hi,
      If they are similar samples for the same TF or from same cells, the comparison is possible. The first step is to normalize them, by having equal number of reads in both of them. This can be done by sampling technique, just get the lower number among the two, and subtract the number of extra reads randomly from the other sample, which equalizes them.

      Then, you can have the peak comparisons at some gene cadidates, for a extensive search you have to get the gene list where the binding profiles are observed and have a correlation analysis, this will answer few questions.

      Also, you can overlay the H3K4(active) and H3K27(repressive) signals to determine the state of chromatin.
      These is one kind of analysis you can do

      Cheers

      Comment

      • danielr
        Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 11

        #4
        I'd take the equally-sized peaks from one and count reads from the other, and vice versa. And compare to random regions.

        seqminer is also nice for this problem, as it sometimes manages to separate clusters of overlapping and non-overlapping sites.

        Equalizing sequence depth doesn't really help, as the greatest factor for sensitivity is signal to genomic background ratio, and that's different for every ChIP, even with the same antibody.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...