Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AEB
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 1

    Bowtie. Different outputs from equivalent(?) inputs.

    Hello all

    I'm currently trying to align & annotate lots of short sequences to the human genome (from Ensembl) using Bowtie (and R).

    When the query sequences are given on the command line (with -c) as a comma-separated list I cannot make get Bowtie to yield the same result when using a self-created FASTQ-file. The suspected error is what I choose as default (Phred) read qualities in the FASTQ-file. It is clear that if Bowtie is given sequences on the command line it must assume some default read qualities, but what is the default value? I cannot find the answer in the Bowtie manual but I suspect, that the answer is Phred quality 40 (corresponding to ASCII character "h"(?)) since this quality is used with other commands.

    Using "h" as default read-quality, however, does not give exactly the same results? Where am I taking the wrong turn?

    Minimal example: Running

    bowtie -a --fullref Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.63.cdna.all TestFASTQ.fq test1.txt
    bowtie -c -a --fullref Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.63.cdna.all AAATTGCTCTTAGCATA test2.txt

    where the TestFASTQ.fq is simply

    @Seq1
    AAATTGCTCTTAGCATA
    +
    hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    does not give the the same results.

    The output from my R-script is (which filters and formats the bowtie output)

    > genes1
    [1] "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000151789"
    [5] "ENSG00000127081" "ENSG00000122042" "ENSG00000162894" "ENSG00000187699"
    [9] "ENSG00000187699" "ENSG00000231890" "ENSG00000182749" "ENSG00000233124"
    [13] "ENSG00000228002" "ENSG00000101040" "ENSG00000101040" "ENSG00000112773"
    [17] "ENSG00000112773" "ENSG00000112773"
    > genes2
    [1] "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000135829" "ENSG00000151789"
    [5] "ENSG00000127081" "ENSG00000122042" "ENSG00000162894" "ENSG00000231890"
    [9] "ENSG00000187699" "ENSG00000187699" "ENSG00000182749" "ENSG00000233124"
    [13] "ENSG00000228002" "ENSG00000101040" "ENSG00000101040" "ENSG00000112773"
    [17] "ENSG00000112773" "ENSG00000112773"

    (EDIT: The two vectors above differs at positions 8 and 10)

    Can anyone help me?

    Thanks!
    AEB

    ps. does anyone know, how to make Bowtie return Gene Symbols. I.e. get DHX9 for ENSG00000135829 and so on.
    Last edited by AEB; 08-18-2011, 01:41 AM.
  • zee
    NGS specialist
    • Apr 2008
    • 249

    #2
    You should use the org.Hs.eg.db bioconductor package to convert between human gene symbol and Ensembl IDs

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      Today, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
      by SEQadmin2


      With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


      Introduction

      Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
      05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    36 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...