Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zhidong
    Junior Member
    • May 2009
    • 4

    strange SAM output

    Hi,

    I use tophat to run RNAseq project, the sequence is from solexa pair end .
    the below is part of one line in the result.

    ILLUMINA-7A0261_0001:3:77:8496:8665#0 161 chr1 554335 3 64M = 1395011 0

    from the SAM1 manual, I think the insert size is 840676(1395011-554335). but ISIZE(inferred Insert SIZE) is 0. how can explain it.




    zhidong
  • macrowave
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 13

    #2
    Can you try using other short read mapper such as bwa to see the insert size distribution? Or you can use the Bio:B::Sam perl modules to access the entire sam/bam, and infer the insert size distribution.

    Comment

    • zhidong
      Junior Member
      • May 2009
      • 4

      #3
      thank you , macrowave.

      but I run RNAseq project. bwa seems not fit for mapping RNA sequence to Genome

      Comment

      • macrowave
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 13

        #4
        Can you provide more specific information, such as the fragment size, read length, the expected insert sizes, reference type (genome or transcriptome)? Form my experience, paired-end mapping with bowtie to predicted transcriptome yielded expected insert size distribution. By the way, BWA is perfectly fine for mRNA-Seq mapping to the genome, it's just harder to estimate insert size because of the introns, and you'll get weird inferred size distribution as the variable intron length. The Bio:B::Sam perl module has functions to access all proper mapped paired reads from sam/bam , from no matter which mapper you use. So it's a good idea to get all pairs in a region and see the real distribution.

        Comment

        • macrowave
          Member
          • May 2010
          • 13

          #5
          Just realized that your problem might be a bug in TopHat. In the newest TopHat release notes, they say 'TLEN field in SAM format is correctly output', which means you may be using an older release that doesn't output the isize correctly.

          Comment

          • macrowave
            Member
            • May 2010
            • 13

            #6
            and the sam flag 161 (1+32+128) means the paired reads mapped one forward, one reverse, but for some reason, the aligner thinks the pair isn't right (not properly aligned?), so that might be also a reason it returns a zero isize.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • mylaser
              Reply to Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by mylaser
              Kheloyar – Everything You Need to Know About Kheloyaar Login and Kheoyar Id
              If you are looking for an online gaming platform that offers a user-friendly experience, Kheloyar has become a name that many users search for. Whether you're interested in creating a new account, accessing your dashboard through Kheloyaar Login, or learning how to obtain a Kheoyar Id, understanding the platform's features and account process is essential.
              This guide explains everything you need to know about...
              Yesterday, 01:13 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            10 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...