Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • madhu
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 4

    #1

    Bfast alignment



    I used Bfast to align my Chip-Seq data. Unfortunately the percentage of reads got aligned is very less.
    I used the default parameters to run 'matches' and 'local align'

    This is the log information:

    Performing alignment...
    Reads processed: 12000000
    Alignment complete.
    Performed 859254 local alignments.
    Outputted alignments for 112106 reads.
    Outputted 11887894 reads for which there were no alignments.
    Outputting complete.
    *********************************************************

    Please let me know.. why I get such a low percentage of aligned read in Bfast?

    Also i used Bowtie to align the same data, I got very different result:

    # reads processed: 12000000
    # reads with at least one reported alignment: 11220913 (93.51%)
    # reads that failed to align: 779087 (6.49%)
    Reported 11220913 alignments to 1 output stream(s)

    Thanks,
    Madhu
    Madhu
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    Is this SOLiD or Illumina data? Can you show us the commands you used, as well as the BFAST version #?

    Comment

    • madhu
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 4

      #3
      This is Illumina data.
      I used ./bfast localalign -f ../../genomes/mm9_genome.fa -m $list\_matches.bmf -u -t > $list\_bfast.aligned.file.baf
      Madhu

      Comment

      • nilshomer
        Nils Homer
        • Nov 2008
        • 1283

        #4
        Remove the "-u" option.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...