Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • alessandra85
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 10

    #1

    edgeR p-value and logFC

    Dear all,

    I am kind of new at RNAseq analysis. I hope someone can help me? I got like 880 genes with a p-value <0.01, using edgeR. I got the table with those 880 genes, and I separate the genes by up (+) and down (-) regulated by the LogFC option. But then I found that some of the 880 genes had a p value > 0.01 like 2,01E+05
    Is there any explanation for this? What is the best way to get the DE genes, by p-value or logFC?

    Thanks,
  • macrowave
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 13

    #2
    You may filter the edge$table object within R using subset functions, I'm sure you'll get the right results. Usually, as a rule of thumb, I use P<=0.05 and logFC>=1 or logFC<=-1, in other words, fold change larger than two, and still statistically significant.

    Comment

    • alessandra85
      Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 10

      #3
      Thanks for your reply!! I did it again within R and I got the rigth results. But now I got another question. I have a gene that is kind of important for me:

      contig03563 -11.329612 1.0838975 1.168637e-03 4.800752e-02

      contig03563 41 47

      Based on the logFC = 1.08 is up regulated, but if I saw the raw data is down? and this happens with some others too. is ok to look ath the raw data? Could it be because of the small logFC?
      is this still statistically significant? Can I believe in this results? I am really confused with the logFC meaning.

      I'll really appreciate any help!!

      Comment

      • macrowave
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 13

        #4
        Looks like you don't have replicates. The difference between raw counts and edgeR might be from the normalization you did in the edgeR process. So if no replicates, I wouldn't trust the results. For me, I can't say anything if there is no replicates for 41 and 47.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...