Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • alessandra85
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 10

    edgeR p-value and logFC

    Dear all,

    I am kind of new at RNAseq analysis. I hope someone can help me? I got like 880 genes with a p-value <0.01, using edgeR. I got the table with those 880 genes, and I separate the genes by up (+) and down (-) regulated by the LogFC option. But then I found that some of the 880 genes had a p value > 0.01 like 2,01E+05
    Is there any explanation for this? What is the best way to get the DE genes, by p-value or logFC?

    Thanks,
  • macrowave
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 13

    #2
    You may filter the edge$table object within R using subset functions, I'm sure you'll get the right results. Usually, as a rule of thumb, I use P<=0.05 and logFC>=1 or logFC<=-1, in other words, fold change larger than two, and still statistically significant.

    Comment

    • alessandra85
      Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 10

      #3
      Thanks for your reply!! I did it again within R and I got the rigth results. But now I got another question. I have a gene that is kind of important for me:

      contig03563 -11.329612 1.0838975 1.168637e-03 4.800752e-02

      contig03563 41 47

      Based on the logFC = 1.08 is up regulated, but if I saw the raw data is down? and this happens with some others too. is ok to look ath the raw data? Could it be because of the small logFC?
      is this still statistically significant? Can I believe in this results? I am really confused with the logFC meaning.

      I'll really appreciate any help!!

      Comment

      • macrowave
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 13

        #4
        Looks like you don't have replicates. The difference between raw counts and edgeR might be from the normalization you did in the edgeR process. So if no replicates, I wouldn't trust the results. For me, I can't say anything if there is no replicates for 41 and 47.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...