Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • alessandra85
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 10

    #1

    edgeR p-value and logFC

    Dear all,

    I am kind of new at RNAseq analysis. I hope someone can help me? I got like 880 genes with a p-value <0.01, using edgeR. I got the table with those 880 genes, and I separate the genes by up (+) and down (-) regulated by the LogFC option. But then I found that some of the 880 genes had a p value > 0.01 like 2,01E+05
    Is there any explanation for this? What is the best way to get the DE genes, by p-value or logFC?

    Thanks,
  • macrowave
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 13

    #2
    You may filter the edge$table object within R using subset functions, I'm sure you'll get the right results. Usually, as a rule of thumb, I use P<=0.05 and logFC>=1 or logFC<=-1, in other words, fold change larger than two, and still statistically significant.

    Comment

    • alessandra85
      Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 10

      #3
      Thanks for your reply!! I did it again within R and I got the rigth results. But now I got another question. I have a gene that is kind of important for me:

      contig03563 -11.329612 1.0838975 1.168637e-03 4.800752e-02

      contig03563 41 47

      Based on the logFC = 1.08 is up regulated, but if I saw the raw data is down? and this happens with some others too. is ok to look ath the raw data? Could it be because of the small logFC?
      is this still statistically significant? Can I believe in this results? I am really confused with the logFC meaning.

      I'll really appreciate any help!!

      Comment

      • macrowave
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 13

        #4
        Looks like you don't have replicates. The difference between raw counts and edgeR might be from the normalization you did in the edgeR process. So if no replicates, I wouldn't trust the results. For me, I can't say anything if there is no replicates for 41 and 47.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        32 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...