Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Layla
    Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 58

    #1

    maq match command

    Dear all,

    I have a text file generated from the maq match command aligning paired end short reads to a reference genome. Any ideas how to filter out poor quality reads from this file, i.e. those reads that have been mapped to more than 1 location in the genome?

    How are people generally dealing with multiple hits from single read in the genome?

    Thanks for any help

    L
  • jnfass
    Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 88

    #2
    It all depends!

    Which text file are you referring to? Pileup? Dumped hits? If you specify how exactly you generated it, that will help others help you ...

    Also, for the map and downstream steps (consensus, SNP calling), maq puts a read that maps equally well (and satisfies the specified cutoffs) to multiple locations in the reference, in one of those locations ... randomly. This may or may not suit your needs, but as far as I know, there's no way to change it. You should be able to determine which reads map multiple times (and thus exclude them in a second round of mapping) by parsing the dumped hits file .. specified in the '-H' option to the map/match command ...

    Hope that helps
    ~Joe

    Comment

    • Layla
      Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 58

      #3
      The file I was referring to was generated using the maq match command. I have re-run the maq match command using the -H and -u options. Do you think the multiple matches should be removed and the maq match command run again or would it be sufficient to remove the multiple matches and move on to do a pileup.

      At this stage I shall focus on correctly paired reads (flagged 18), remove multiple hits (flag of 0) and also low mapping quality scores (<30).

      Any other suggestions or comments how people would go about cleaning their chip-seq data?

      Cheers

      L

      Comment

      • jnfass
        Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 88

        #4
        Sounds like you're talking about the mapview output ... generated from the "mapview" command, using the binary map file generated by the map/match command. I'm not as familiar with that file - for instance, I didn't know that there was a flag for multiply mapped reads in mapview's output - but it sounds like you've got a good strategy for parsing that file and filtering your pairs.

        Comment

        • Layla
          Member
          • Sep 2008
          • 58

          #5
          Thanx Joe..

          How did you convert the file created using the -H option in ./maq match command. The -H option was to generate the multiple hits and created a binary file. The ./maq mapview conversion does not work as it does for out.map. Is there a way to convert this binary file to text?

          Cheers
          L

          Comment

          • Owen
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 1

            #6
            Layla, the file created with the -H option is not actually a binary file but a gzipped text file with information about the multiply mapped reads. I had the same confusion and finally figured this out!

            Comment

            • bioinfosm
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2008
              • 483

              #7
              I figured the same fact as Owen explains, its gzipped!
              For multiply mapped reads from mapview result, the reads with 0 quality are mapped to multiple locations, using -q 1 should do the trick in excluding multiply-mapped reads

              Thoughts?
              --
              bioinfosm

              Comment

              • Layla
                Member
                • Sep 2008
                • 58

                #8
                I think q -1 sounds like a valid option. Or you can simple grep for reads with the 0 flag and remove them before down-stream processing.

                Whilst on this note, anyone used SISSR instead of Maq? And if so, any thoughts on what to do with the data after SISSR gives 80,000 potential binding sites with p values < 0.001, high tag counts and fold changes?

                The data never simplifies!!!!

                L

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • kinpict.com
                  Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by kinpict.com
                  The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                  Today, 06:37 PM
                • SEQadmin2
                  16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by SEQadmin2





                  NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                  10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
                0 responses
                35 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
                2 responses
                56 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post kinpict.com  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                0 responses
                175 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...