Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #31
    Originally posted by NextGenSeb View Post
    Hi Nils,
    just stumbled across dwgsim in my search for a read simulator, love the fact that I can generate Illumina, Solid and Ion-torrent on the same tool as I have data from all platforms. Nice touch as well on including the galaxy wrappers
    At the risk of sounding ungrateful, is there an ETA on the dwgsim_pileup_eval.pl? You'd solve all my problems in one go.
    Thanks for sharing,
    Cheers
    Seb
    No, I haven't thought about when/if I am going to update it. It works fine on samtools pileup data, but now needs VCF support. I'd also like to re-write it in python to improve maintainability. Nevertheless, I am always be happy to accept patches or contributions, as your free time is as free as mine .

    Comment

    • NextGenSeb
      Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 15

      #32
      Fair enough, maybe that gives me teh motivation to finally improve my almost non-existent python skills

      Got a few more questions fo ryou though:

      1. The "bed-like" format for candidate mutations (-b option), what is that supposed to look like? From the header files the first three columns are pretty clear, but I am stuck with regards to the mutation type and the rest of the file

      2. Still in reagards to mutations, is there a way to simulate specific mutation frequencies? I would like like to test aligners and variant callers for somatic mutations and hence need a degree of frequency control over the inserted mutations.

      3. The IonTorrent homopolymer errors (elegedly) got better with the new chemistry. Is there a way to potentially adjust the error frequencies in the program for this?

      Thanks for the quick reply and your comments.

      Cheers
      Seb

      Comment

      • nilshomer
        Nils Homer
        • Nov 2008
        • 1283

        #33
        Originally posted by NextGenSeb View Post
        Fair enough, maybe that gives me teh motivation to finally improve my almost non-existent python skills

        Got a few more questions fo ryou though:
        I found those skills come in handy!

        Originally posted by NextGenSeb View Post
        1. The "bed-like" format for candidate mutations (-b option), what is that supposed to look like? From the header files the first three columns are pretty clear, but I am stuck with regards to the mutation type and the rest of the file
        Use the VCF support in the latest GIT code. If you still want to use the bed-like format, the source code is the documentation!

        Originally posted by NextGenSeb View Post
        2. Still in reagards to mutations, is there a way to simulate specific mutation frequencies? I would like like to test aligners and variant callers for somatic mutations and hence need a degree of frequency control over the inserted mutations.
        None yet, but I don't see why that couldn't be added (search for instances of 0.5 in the code).

        Originally posted by NextGenSeb View Post
        3. The IonTorrent homopolymer errors (elegedly) got better with the new chemistry. Is there a way to potentially adjust the error frequencies in the program for this?
        Seb
        Yes, see the "-e/-E" options. I like the "elegedly" .

        Comment

        • NextGenSeb
          Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 15

          #34
          Great, thanks again for your help. I'll give it a go and let you know the outcome. Once I have results from the new chemistry I'' try to remember to put that up as well.

          Cheers
          Seb

          Comment

          • chintanspy
            Member
            • Sep 2010
            • 16

            #35
            Hi Nils,

            what parameters are used for placing a read under 'mi' category?

            After observing the results, not all the reads which map at different co-ordinate than simulated position are categorized under 'mi'.
            Regards,
            Chintan Vora

            Comment

            • nilshomer
              Nils Homer
              • Nov 2008
              • 1283

              #36
              Originally posted by chintanspy View Post
              Hi Nils,

              what parameters are used for placing a read under 'mi' category?

              After observing the results, not all the reads which map at different co-ordinate than simulated position are categorized under 'mi'.
              From the header: "# mi' | the number of reads mapped incorrectly that should be mapped be mapped at or greater than that threshold".

              It can also be affected by the "-g" parameter.

              Comment

              • chintanspy
                Member
                • Sep 2010
                • 16

                #37
                Originally posted by nilshomer View Post
                It can also be affected by the "-g" parameter.
                I could not find " -g" parameter. Am I looking at wrong patch (nh13-DWGSIM-2fc8222) ?
                Regards,
                Chintan Vora

                Comment

                • nilshomer
                  Nils Homer
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 1283

                  #38
                  Originally posted by chintanspy View Post
                  I could not find " -g" parameter. Am I looking at wrong patch (nh13-DWGSIM-2fc8222) ?
                  See "dwgsim_eval".

                  Comment

                  • plantae
                    Junior Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 7

                    #39
                    I was confused by "-d" opinition
                    NB: the -d option was previously incorrectly stated as being the outer distance, but is in fact the inner distance.

                    for a PE-read

                    5--->3______3<---5

                    "-d" means for distance between 3' and 3' of the PE reads?

                    Comment

                    • nilshomer
                      Nils Homer
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 1283

                      #40
                      Originally posted by plantae View Post
                      I was confused by "-d" opinition
                      NB: the -d option was previously incorrectly stated as being the outer distance, but is in fact the inner distance.

                      for a PE-read

                      5--->3______3<---5

                      "-d" means for distance between 3' and 3' of the PE reads?
                      See the help message for the latest version.

                      Comment

                      • adaptivegenome
                        Super Moderator
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 436

                        #41
                        Are you planning to publish this? We just cited it in a paper we submitted, but since there was no paper we cited the link to the software....

                        Comment

                        • plantae
                          Junior Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 7

                          #42
                          Originally posted by nilshomer View Post
                          See the help message for the latest version.
                          I have intalled version 0.1.10, the help message did not clear specify the "-d" opinion

                          -d INT inner distance between the two ends [500]

                          "the two ends"
                          means for two pair-end reads?
                          or 3' end of two pair-end reads?
                          or 5' end of two pair-end reads?

                          Comment

                          • liu_xt005
                            Member
                            • Jun 2011
                            • 24

                            #43
                            I have used dwgsim 0.1.10 to generate reads from hg19 chromosome 22, and tested the sensitivities of variant callers SAMtools, GATK, and glfSingle.
                            The default per base error rate 0.02 is used.
                            Even up to 100X ('-C 100' in simulation), GATK and glfSingle can identify only 86% the the variants. But SAMtools can call 95%.
                            Shall I reduce the error rate?

                            Comment

                            • nilshomer
                              Nils Homer
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 1283

                              #44
                              Please post your questions in a new thread, thanks!

                              Comment

                              Latest Articles

                              Collapse

                              • SEQadmin2
                                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                                by SEQadmin2



                                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                                ...
                                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                              • SEQadmin2
                                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                                by SEQadmin2


                                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                                ...
                                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                              ad_right_rmr

                              Collapse

                              News

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                              0 responses
                              16 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                              0 responses
                              21 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                              0 responses
                              22 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                              0 responses
                              27 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Working...