Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • efoss
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 98

    adding platform information to a bam file

    In using "CountCovariates" for base quality score recalibration, I got a complaint that the platform information was missing. I can force it to default to "illumina" with the "-dP" option, but that doesn't seem wise, and I imagine that more problems will crop up in the future if I do that. I looked in the bwa manual to see if there was an option in sampe (like I've seen for adding read group information), but I didn't see anything. Does anyone know how to add this information?

    Thank you.

    Eric
  • sdvie
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 68

    #2
    Hi Eric,

    you have to run AddOrReplaceReadgroups from picard tools for your bams before running the recalibration.

    cheers,
    Sophia

    Comment

    • efoss
      Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 98

      #3
      Originally posted by sdvie View Post
      Hi Eric,

      you have to run AddOrReplaceReadgroups from picard tools for your bams before running the recalibration.

      cheers,
      Sophia
      Thanks very much, Sophia. That worked.

      Eric

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        Today, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...