Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • andy11
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 5

    Calling heterozygosity in NGS data

    In genotyping from NGS data, what is the best way to account for bias (sequencing, mapping, etc) when identifying a locus as homozygous vs heterozygous?

    Thanks for any help!
  • Heisman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 534

    #2
    Not quite sure what you mean by locus. Do you mean specific SNP calls? If so there are many programs out there to call SNPs and will attempt to correctly determine if they are homozygous or heterozygous.

    As for bias, it's good to make sure to remove any PCR duplicates.

    Comment

    • andy11
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 5

      #3
      Yes, exactly. I was wondering what those programs do to determine if a locus is homozygous or heterozygous.

      Comment

      • Heisman
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 534

        #4
        SAMtools mpileup is pretty good. It's the only common one I'm really familiar with so I don't want to try to compare it to others in any way, but I know it's used fairly commonly.

        Comment

        • sdvie
          Member
          • Jul 2010
          • 68

          #5
          Originally posted by andy11 View Post
          Yes, exactly. I was wondering what those programs do to determine if a locus is homozygous or heterozygous.
          The programs that I know (samtools mpileup + bcf tools and GATK unified genotyper), basically count the number of reads in your experiment supporting one or another allele at a SNP position, and then they estimate whether the ratio of 1st allele to 2nd allele is 50 : 50 or 100 : 0 (usually one of the alleles corresponds to the reference sequence, and the other to the alternative sequence).

          The field "AF" (allele frequency) in the vcf-format file gives you this information.

          Hope that helps.

          Cheers,
          Sophia

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...