Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pinki999
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 37

    How to find coverage for RNA-seq, solid data?

    Hi,

    I am trying to look into the coverage of transcriptome (solid) data but no luck. I downloaded the reference bed file from UCSC genome browser for the know genes and used bedtools to find the coverage. I am getting negative percentage. Anyone out there with a solution for this?

    Thank you
  • shurjo
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 132

    #2
    Originally posted by pinki999 View Post
    Hi,

    I am trying to look into the coverage of transcriptome (solid) data but no luck. I downloaded the reference bed file from UCSC genome browser for the know genes and used bedtools to find the coverage. I am getting negative percentage. Anyone out there with a solution for this?

    Thank you
    I've used coevrageBed from BedTools for this and negative percentages sounds somewhat surprising. Can you post the syntax you used on the command line and maybe a short section from your output file?

    Comment

    • pinki999
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 37

      #3
      Hi,

      I used the following command

      coverageBed -hist -s -abam input.bam -b known_genes.bed

      and in the attachment you can find the short output file.

      Thank you.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...