Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • schaffer
    Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 12

    #1

    RNA-Seq compare edgeR, cufflinks, Partek

    Hi,
    I have compared RNA-Seq in 3 different platforms and get 3 different lists of differential gene expression. Has anyone done this kind of comparison?
    What do you think about this?
    Lana
  • severin
    Genome Informatics Facility
    • Sep 2009
    • 105

    #2
    how different?

    Are the 3 lists from the same set of data?
    What percentage of genes are the same? different?
    Are the programs using different statistical tests to make the comparisons?
    Do they all incorporate/deal with replicates the same way?
    What are the cutoff p-value used in each? Do they all correct for FDR?

    I would be surprised if you had no genes in common between the three programs.

    Comment

    • mgogol
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2008
      • 197

      #3
      Are there really NO genes in common? Do they share gene ontology terms or pathways?

      Unfortunately, I think it's pretty common in bioinformatics for the analysis techniques to have large effects on the final list of genes and their rank. You could test genes from each list with qpcr to try to see which are the most solid.

      Comment

      • Simon Anders
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 995

        #4
        There are a couple of threads that may be of interest, including these:

        Application of sequencing to RNA analysis (RNA-Seq, whole transcriptome, SAGE, expression analysis, novel organism mining, splice variants)

        Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:35 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        43 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...