Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • loba17
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 19

    Removing similar sequence reads

    Dear All

    I am looking for a fast way to remove similar sequence reads or to find unique records.

    I have 7 large fasta files with about 2 *10^6 short sequence reads in each. I have collapsed each file (removed identical sequences) in order to decrease file size. Now I would like to compare two files at a time and find all the unique sequences for each file. It is easy to remove identical records but in my case I would also like to find (highly) similar sequences. I tried blastn -task blastn-short (because the sequences are <100nt) but it takes a long time even with -num_threads 10. Megablast would be faster but I think it will not work with short sequences. Any suggestions?

    Thank you very much and I am looking forward to your replies
  • maasha
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 153

    #2
    Have a look at Uclust

    Comment

    • biznatch
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 124

      #3
      Maybe PatternHunter?

      Comment

      • cedance
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 108

        #4
        Are the sequences you are wanting to compare between files of the same length? (if that's the case, edit distance calculation would be a handy trick).
        Last edited by cedance; 10-14-2011, 07:44 AM.

        Comment

        • loba17
          Member
          • Sep 2011
          • 19

          #5
          Dear maasha,

          I tried usearch/sort/cluster and it works fine. Thanks a lot!

          Dear biznatch,

          I checked out the PatternHunter website. I guess I could use the homology search tool but I did not bother with getting a trial version since I was not sure how much a license will be at the end. Thanks for the suggestion though.

          Dear cedance,

          no the sequences are of different length. Good idea but I guess it work only for aligned sequences. Thanks!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...