Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • erikjlar
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 3

    #16
    Thanks again for the input. I don't want to bother Cole with more questions - but maybe someone else can comment on alternative solutions if one just wants to do a simple gene-level summarization of reads.

    It seems to me that for this scenario, the sophistication of cufflinks can get in the way of getting a robust expression estimate (see my previous post and picture to see what I mean).

    Basically, for the example above I would be happy to just get FPKM values, or even read counts, based on all MYH11 exons - but excluding positions that ambiguously overlap with other genes.

    Someone must be doing this sort of "array-style" abundance estimates?

    Comment

    • dglemay
      Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 16

      #17
      gene-level estimates

      You could use the genes.fpkm_tracking files to get the FPKMs summarized at the gene level.

      Comment

      • Jon_Keats
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 279

        #18
        Update

        I've had a chance to check my original dataset for the frequency of "FAIL" genes now with the newest version of Cufflinks. It is much improved with the number of FAIL genes now being between 73-238 compared to the previous version where the "FAIL" genes were between 8000-12,000 genes. There is still a trend for more "FAIL" genes as the number of aligned reads increases which I find odd but at this frequency it seems acceptable.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...