Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • apratap
    Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 58

    cufflinks not able to assemble transcripts in high read coverage area

    Hey Guys

    I am using cufflinks for building transcriptome. I am seeing some regions where in-silico model predictions is re-affirmed by RNA-Seq data but however cufflinks or scripture is not able to assemble a transcript.

    Is there anything that we can do to improve the sensitivity of cufflinks.

    Here is a snapshot of on such example.



    PS: this message was also cross posted on Biostar but unfortunately I didn't get any response there.

    Thanks!
    -Abhi
  • Wallysb01
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 286

    #2
    You can increase the -L option to filter out a higher isoform fraction. This should help with not including unspliced introns. Also, increasing -j will help the same thing.

    Though its not as related to your specific question, I've increased the --min-frags-per-transfrag option to reduce the number of transcripts called.

    I've found this RABT assembly to be pretty messy no matter what parameters I fiddled with. If you're really concerned with creating the best annotations you can, you should probably use ABySS and trans-ABySS. Its a lot of work, but I'm starting to get some very good results.

    Comment

    • apratap
      Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 58

      #3
      @Wallysb01 : Thanks for your reply.

      I am not sure how -j could help as the number of reads that seem to mapping to intronic regions for this particular gene is very less compared to spliced reads.

      Also wats a RABT assembly ?

      I am interested in knowing any specific reason why you find ABySS and trans-ABySS to do a better job ?

      Thanks!
      -Abhi

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...