Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aunderwo
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 6

    Varscan and mpileup

    Hi all

    does anybody gave any experience in using mpileup and then using varscans new mpileup2snp function to call SNPs?

    I have generated 2 bam files and then used samtols mpileup to produce a pileup file

    samtools mpileup -f ref.fas sample1.bam sample2.bam > out.pileup

    However
    java -jar VarScan.v2.2.8.jar mpileup2snp --min-coverage 10 --min-var-freq 0.9 --min-reads2 9 --strand-filter < out.pileup

    throws an exception

    Input Parameter Threw Exception: For input string: "out.pileup"

    running the equivalent pileup command works but with no SNPs

    java -jar VarScan.v2.2.8.jar pileup2snp --min-coverage 10 --min-var-freq 0.9 --min-reads2 9 --strand-filter < out.pileup

    This suggests I am not getting the correct mpileup file that Varscan expects.

    Please can someone advise on the correct procedure.

    Thanks Anthony
  • dkoboldt
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 62

    #2
    Hello,

    I believe that you are using the command incorrectly. The input file should come after the VarScan subcommand, e.g.:

    java -jar VarScan.v2.2.8.jar mpileup2snp out.pileup --min-coverage 10 --min-var-freq 0.9 --min-reads2 9 --strand-filter

    Comment

    • aunderwo
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 6

      #3
      It turns out that you can specify the input either as mpileup2snp out.pileup options OR mpileup2snp options < out.pileup.

      The problem was --strand-filter needs an option (1 for on, 0 for off)

      However now I need to find out how to interpret the mpileup2snp output. Can't see anything on the varscan site.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...