Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dsidote
    Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 23

    #1

    SHRiMP alignment results for colorspace miRNA

    I'm trying to use SHRiMP to analyze a miRNA dataset using AB colorspace reads. I noticed when looking at the alignments using the pretty print option (-P) that SHRiMP aligns bases to the end of a read rather than the next base in the sequence. Does anyone know how to stop this behavior? I've tried various options but haven't figured out the solution yet.

    Here is an example. the read and the reference are both ACTGTGGGCCCTTTCCGCACCA, yet SHRiMP aligns an A to the end of the read and calls it an insertion of AATCACCG.

    >3_306_617 MIR-675Y_HSA-MIR-675___ - 1 22 1 30 30 129 12T8(AATCACCG)1
    ACTGTGGGCCCTCTCCGCACC--------A 1
    ACTGTGGGCCCTTTCCGCACCAATCACCGA
    212111003002002033110103211032 30
    Attached Files
    Last edited by dsidote; 11-10-2011, 08:29 AM.
  • brentp
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 72

    #2
    That may be because it does a global alignment by default, you could try setting either the --local or --bfast flags to gmapper-cs and see if that helps.

    Comment

    • dsidote
      Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 23

      #3
      Aside from the read counts, I would also like to know what bases this particular enzyme adds to the end of the miRNA during amplification. I tried using the local setting and it does change the way SHRiMP reports the aligned reads, that is, its no longer reporting gaps where there shouldn't be, but it no longer reports the end of the read that does not align. I'll give the bfast option a try. Thanks.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...