Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ega2d
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 12

    #1

    Identifying composition of cufflinks transfrag

    Hi all,

    This question has been dogging me for quite some time and I'm hoping the collective wisdom of seqanswers will be able to answer my question.

    Given a specific TCONS_ID (transfrag identified by Cufflinks), is there a good (i.e. fast) way to pinpoint what exactly about that transfrag is unique??? Aside from making a really pretty table of "total splice events", it seems like transcript composition would a top priority for most people doing RNAseq...

    Thanks in advance!
  • RockChalkJayhawk
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 192

    #2
    This is actually a pretty annoying problem because most of the transcripts I have seen are only different by a few bases, usually at the end of an exon. These arise from the inability to split short reads in the correct place and subsequently map them correctly.

    One way to do it could be to use mergeBed from the BEDtools suite. You can specify to keep the names. For pieces of transcripts that are unique to only one transcriptional unit, they will only have one name attached. If there are more, then they will have each transcript name separated by a semicolon. Then use :

    grep -v ";" file > unique transcript positions

    Comment

    • ega2d
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 12

      #3
      Hey there,

      THANKS SO MUCH FOR THE REPLY. I am finding the same instances where these splicing events only different by a few nt as well. I thought that if I ran the alignment with 0 mismatches it would be better, but still I would really love to figure out which ones are real and which ones are misalignments.

      I think I follow your suggestion about identifying unique exon coordinates, but please tell me if this is what you meant:

      mergeBed on combined.gtf to remove spurious "alternative splicing events" that are really only part of a known exon

      then re-run cuffdiff?

      Thanks again for answering, like I said this problem had been driving me crazy.

      Comment

      • RockChalkJayhawk
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 192

        #4
        You can't run cuffdiff on that kind of file. This is only for finding the unique parts of transcripts.

        You SHOULD NOT require 0 mismatches. This introduces another issue. The problem will not go away. What if your gene has a real genetic polymorphism (or an error in the reference) near the splice site? It may not get any reads mapped to this area, and you wouldn't see the (full) transcript.

        Comment

        • ega2d
          Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 12

          #5
          Yeah, I realized my mistake about the bed file after I posted. I also have ran my analyses with the default 1-2 mismatches and honestly, didn't see that much of a change.

          My real question is what file to run mergeBed with?

          Thanks again for your reply!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          60 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          46 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          48 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...