Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hequn
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 2

    #1

    problem for velvet parameters and results

    Hi,everyone
    I used velvet to assembly my data of transcriptome days ago,when it was finished,I get a file "contigs.fa" of 230M.I think it is too small.I use the parameters like "velveth output_directory 31 -shortPaired -fastq read1.fq read2.fq" and "velvetg output_directory -ins_length 200".Could you give me some advise?Thanks very much.

    When I use velvet,should the pair-end read be same length? Since I have trimmed the reads for low quality,so the reads are different in the length size.
    Last edited by hequn; 11-16-2011, 11:23 PM. Reason: I have a new problem
  • bioBob
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 72

    #2
    Hi hequn.

    could you give some statistics on your reads? Length and count? Also, how did you trim your reads? Did you make sure that the files are still in paired order? IE if you delete a read in file 1, did you delete it in file 2?

    I do not think the members of the pairs have to be the same length with the one exception that they won't be considered if they are shorter than your kmer.

    Comment

    • hequn
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 2

      #3
      Hi bioBob,
      Thanks for your answers.I haves nearly 30millions reads of 100bp,I trimmed the reads with the parameter "-a(quality score) 25 -l 25(default)" by using Btrim.It will remain the reads whose length is larger than 25bp.The Btrim can distinguish the single-end and pair-end reads automatically when it is finished.Today I tried k=21 and got a file "contigs.fa" of 253M.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
        by SEQadmin2



        CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

        Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
        ...
        07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
        by SEQadmin2


        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
        ...
        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
      0 responses
      37 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
      0 responses
      43 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...