Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kga1978
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 100

    #1

    Suggestions for aligners?

    Hi all,

    We have been trying out various aligners over the last many months, but I wanted to get some input from the community on suggested aligners. The genomes we have are as follows:

    Genome:
    Viral (RNA-based)
    10kb genome
    High divergence (5-10% normal, sometimes 15%)

    Considerations:
    We don't care about memory (small genome)
    Aligner must be able to deal with divergence and gaps (few)
    We don't care about (super) speed
    Preferably scalable and 'pipeable' (samtools, picard, GATK, etc.).

    Goals:
    Consensus sequence for 'standard' phylo studies
    High-coverage (>150x) for intra-host SNP detection

    We mostly use illumina 50bp SE sequencing, but also have 100bp PE and ~500bp 454 sequencing. We have been testing multiple different aligners and have focused on the following:

    BFAST
    BWA
    SSAHA2
    NovoAlign
    Mosaik (mostly v1, but v2 just came out)
    Stampy

    So far we have had most success with Mosaik and NovoAlign in terms of specificity and sensitivity on the Illumina platform. For 454 we have only used Mosaik for now (which works well - but homopolymer and CAFIE errors have to be cleaned up manually). For these two tools we generally use a hash-size of 6 and a divergence of 0.1. For Mosaik we also specify an 'act' threshold of 10. We have tweaked several other parameters, but have found them to influence the alignments very minimally.

    I was wondering if anybody would have further insights or suggestions? We are currently scaling up production so any suggestions and comments would be most welcome.
  • kga1978
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 100

    #2
    Great question! I do wonder if anybody would have some input...?

    Comment

    • mchaisso
      Member
      • Apr 2008
      • 84

      #3
      Try bwa-sw, it is shown to work well for 454 reads and divergent genomes.

      Comment

      • gsgs
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 139

        #4
        I've been using MAFFT for influenza


        but recently figured out that it is overkill for most
        practical problems, when you have a common ancestor-sequence,
        a referrence that you can align to.

        I've built a list of ~200 index-sequences to which I can quickly
        compare new flu- lists (e.g. genbank updates) without alignment,
        to which group they belong.
        Then I group the sequences accordingly and do index-base-alignment
        for each group separately.

        Or I align first without gaps (easy+fast) and then filter out (discard)
        sequences that are distant, didn't align well.
        They may have insertions,deletions or sequencing errors.
        These ~1% of sequences are then omitted or aligned with
        MAFFT (slower) in a 2nd step.

        I did this for e.g. for all avian PB2 or such, 10000 sequences
        of length 2280, max.~400 mutations
        Last edited by gsgs; 12-15-2012, 10:05 PM.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        42 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...