Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xguo
    Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 48

    #1

    DEXSeq error

    Hi, there,
    I have been trying to use DEXSeq for alternative splicing analysis. We have RNA-Seq data for 9 pairs of normal/tumor samples and I'm doing paired analysis following example in the DEXSeq manual. Some errors I got when doing testGeneForDEU are as follows:

    Error in chol.default(XVX + lambda * I) :
    the leading minor of order 22 is not positive definite
    Error in chol.default(XVX + lambda * I) :
    the leading minor of order 22 is not positive definite
    In addition: Warning message:
    In testGeneForDEU(rumExons, formula0 = formula0, formula1 = formula1, :
    Error in fit1 for gene ENSG00000127928, exon E008: Error in chol.default(XVX + lambda * I) :

    Does anyone what these errors mean?

    thanks a bunch!
  • Wolfgang Huber
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 109

    #2
    Dear Xguo

    Can you make sure that you are using a current version of DEXSeq (e.g., latest release http://www.bioconductor.org/packages...ml/DEXSeq.html)

    If the error persists, can you please post
    • the output of sessionInfo().
    • a minimal version of your R script that reproduces the error.
    • ideally, the input data that is necessary to run the script and reproduce the error.

    Best wishes
    Wolfgang
    Wolfgang Huber
    EMBL

    Comment

    • xguo
      Member
      • Jul 2008
      • 48

      #3
      Yes, I'm using the current version from bioconductor. I'll send some input data for you to reproduce the error.

      thanks for looking into it.

      best

      Comment

      • areyes
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2010
        • 165

        #4
        Hi xguo,

        Thanks a lot for your feedback!

        I gave a closer look to the error. The problem arises when calling glmnb.fit at the time of testing. If you look at the count values where the function fails, you will see that these are strange cases e.g. in exon E033 where the variance is really high.

        [CODE]
        > countTableForGene(rumExons, "ENSG00000007350")["E033",]
        1N.txt 2N.txt 1T.txt 2T.txt
        0 1 73 0
        [\CODE]

        These type of exons are not very likely to be called significant, so it should be harmless for your analysis. For the moment, DEXSeq version 1.1.3 now converts this error into a warning (just to avoid your screen to be full of this errors). Anyway, I will try to look for a smarter solution.

        How often do you see this error in your complete data set?

        Comment

        • xguo
          Member
          • Jul 2008
          • 48

          #5
          Thanks a lot for looking into the error and finding out the cause. As you said, it happens when the variation is too large. It doesn't happen very often.

          Do you have any plan to include reads mapped to splice junction in your analysis? DEXSeq currently uses reads mapped to exons only for differential exon usage testing. It seems to waste a lot of information by ignoring junction reads. It'll great if junction reads can also be included in the model or tested separately for cross-validation with exon reads.

          thanks a lot
          Xiang

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...