Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aquleaf
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 38

    ChIP-Seq Integration & Interpretation

    Hi. I have three ChIP-Seq data for the same sample. Peak calling was done separately. How to combine the peaks of these three experiments together?

    One more question, How to associate genes with these binding sites?

    Thanks in advance!
  • mudshark
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 138

    #2
    these are technical replicates, right? So you could simply do the peak calling on the combined data. If you want to do the peak calling first the easiest - maybe not the best - way is to define an overlapping set of peaks.

    About the association, there are some tools around that can help you (i guess Galaxy). On the other hand that is not a too complicated job, isn't it? Calculating the distances to some gene features and stuff.

    Comment

    • ETHANol
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 308

      #3
      I think this is what you are looking for:


      There are some other ideas on my blog at:
      Everything Ethan knows about biology - The Ethan-ome


      On the first question, I agree combining the data is a good way to go. You can also get the common peaks between the samples by using the BedTools intersectBed program. It is also available on Galaxy if you are not comfortable with the command line.
      --------------
      Ethan

      Comment

      • rory
        Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 28

        #4
        Are the replicates purely technical (mutliple lanes of the same library) or was the experiment repeated three times (three different libraries)? This makes a big difference. If it is just three lanes of the same library, then I agree the data should be merged and peaks called once. However without replicating the experiment, you will never be able to get reliable results -- you have no clue as to the variation inherent in the experiment, and whether your library represents an outlier.

        If the experiment was repeated three times, then you should not combine the reads, but rather work with the three peaksets. Start by checking their overlaps (3-way venn diagram). To minimize false positives, you could take only the peaks that all three replicates agree on, or be less stringent and take those that overlap in at least two of the three libraries. Another approach is to take all the peaks, then go back to the aligned reads and re-score each peak for each replicate (whether or not it was identified as a peak in that replicate).

        See also this paper for ideas on how to combine peaksets: http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?servi...oas/1318514284

        If you are using R and Bioconductor, there are a number of packages that can help with this type of analysis. For example DiffBind helps with overlap and re-scoring, and ChIPpeakAnno will map peaks to genes.
        Last edited by rory; 12-02-2011, 07:51 AM. Reason: typo

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          Today, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        38 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...