Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mbblack
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 245

    CuffLinks/CuffDiff frag length for single-end reads

    I have 6 samples, single-end RNAseq runs from a SOLiD 4 machine, and mapped using BioScope 1.3. These are a set of 3 treatment animals and 3 controls (mice). These were barcoded samples (2 slides), 50bp reads.

    My aim is to use CuffDiff (1.2.1) to look at differential expression (and I want to compare to DESeq, and maybe other tools as well). But I am wondering what exactly I should enter for the mean fragment length and standard deviation. I've read the posts mentioning this should be the reads plus the adapters, but that makes no sense to me given the BAM files I have from BioScope. The length of the reads plus adapters, barcode and so forth is 127bp, which means nothing relative to what is actually in my input BAM files for this analysis.

    Taking those BAM files (the wt.sr.bam files from BioScope) I used FastQC to get the fragment length distribution for each wt.sr.bam file produced from the BioScope 1.3 mapping runs, dumped the data from FastQC into JMP Genomics and pulled up the distribution stats.

    Sample Mean Length Std. Dev.
    Treatment -1: 46.71 6.31 (~71.9 million map'd reads)
    Treatment -2: 46.59 6.42 (~72.4 million map'd reads)
    Treatment -3: 45.96 7.26 (~77.5 million map'd reads)
    Control -1: 45.41 7.34 (~76.0 million map'd reads)
    Control -2: 45.66 7.36 (~171.6 million map'd reads)
    Control -3: 46.26 6.69 (~109.4 million map'd reads)
    Combined samples: 46.027 6.997

    Now, it seems to me I should be using the values for the combined samples in CuffDiff, as that is derived directly from the reads which CuffDiff will be chewing on? I was thinking I'd set "-m 46 -s 7" in the CuffDiff command.

    Does that seem logical?

    If not, just how does one come up with the fragment length and standard deviation for single end reads?

    Thanks, Michael
    Last edited by mbblack; 12-13-2011, 04:56 PM.
    Michael Black, Ph.D.
    ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.
  • polsum
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 32

    #2
    I have the same question. I will wait for the experts to answer.

    Comment

    • polyatail
      Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 25

      #3
      The fragment length is the size of the piece of DNA that was sequenced, which is generally significantly longer than the length of the reads. In a paired end run, you can estimate the fragment length by observing the distance in genome coordinates between mapped reads. In a single end run, the only way you'll know is based on the size range that was selected on a gel during library prep. If, for example, the 300-400 bp band was cut out and adapters are 90 bp, your fragment length is 210-310 bp. The SD can vary depending on how wide the size selection was.

      In this case I would ask whoever prepared the library what the fragment length was. I'm not familiar with the requirements of SOLiD, but there may be a fragment size limit and a size that is usually selected, like Illumina.
      Last edited by polyatail; 12-17-2011, 02:54 PM.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        Today, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
        by SEQadmin2


        With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


        Introduction

        Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
        05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      37 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      43 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      49 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...