Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • heiya
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 14

    what's the default species when using repeatmasker

    I used the repeatmasker to predict the repeats, However the result is far lower than the reported, what's the problem?

    I have tested the result is different when you use choose different species for the species option? what's the default species in repeatmasker. In the old version, it default human.
  • adaptivegenome
    Super Moderator
    • Nov 2009
    • 436

    #2
    Not sure what your desired genome is but UCSC has several masked genomes on their site. Maybe you can get a readymade file?

    Comment

    • heiya
      Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 14

      #3
      Originally posted by genericforms View Post
      Not sure what your desired genome is but UCSC has several masked genomes on their site. Maybe you can get a readymade file?
      my desired genome is not presented in the RepBase. for I havenot multiple repeats of my genome, so I had to choose the species which is near to my genome in evolution.

      Comment

      • SES
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 275

        #4
        The default library (when no custom library is specified with the "-lib" option) is a database of repeat proteins in the "Libraries" directory of your RepeatMasker installation.

        There is also the "-species" option that will allow you to specify one library for masking.

        Code:
        -species <query species>
                Specify the species or clade of the input sequence. The species name
                must be a valid NCBI Taxonomy Database species name and be contained
                in the RepeatMasker repeat database. Some examples are:
        
                  -species human
                  -species mouse
                  -species rattus
                  -species "ciona savignyi"
                  -species arabidopsis
        
                Other commonly used species:
        
                mammal, carnivore, rodentia, rat, cow, pig, cat, dog, chicken, fugu,
                danio, "ciona intestinalis" drosophila, anopheles, elegans,
                diatoaea, artiodactyl, arabidopsis, rice, wheat, and maize

        Comment

        • 059
          Junior Member
          • Sep 2011
          • 3

          #5
          you could try "-species all"

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          26 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...