Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigfoot
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 1

    #16
    Dear Nate,

    I am actually considering doing some RNAseq analysis on non-model organism (with reference transcriptome, but no genome) using SOLID data. Did you finally succeed in mapping your SOLID data to your reference transcriptome?

    Cheers,

    Marie

    Comment

    • JueFish
      Member
      • May 2010
      • 42

      #17
      Marie,

      Sorry for the long delay, but I lost track of this thread. Yes, I did finish a bunch of this work, so if you still have any specific questions about what we did, please either add to this thread or drop me a line. Basically, we used SOLiD data in both de novo assembly and subsequent RNA-seq and other analyses.

      Cheers,
      Nate

      Comment

      • tonup69
        Associate Professor
        • Apr 2011
        • 20

        #18
        I am trying to do RNAseq on SOLiD data now and would like to do the work in GALAXY. I did notice the poor quality scores for the .csfastq and the .qual files generated from the xsq files. In fact, when I filtered reads below a quality score of 20 I only got back .67% of the data! Should I go ahead with the untrimmed csfastq files or should I change trim parameters?

        Comment

        • twaddlac
          Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 49

          #19
          I would try them both. Every data set is different so I'm not sure how either will change the data but it won't hurt to try. In my experience, the filtered SOLiD data yielded better results.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...