Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rlegendre
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 7

    #1

    Inconsistent genotype in VCF file

    Hi everybody !

    I try to analyse my SNP calling results given by samtools and bcftools for my Illumina paired-end data.
    My first problem was identify the order in list of Phred-scaled genotype likelihoods (PL). In a old post, they say :

    "(...) A T,G (...) DP=35;AF1=1;CI95=0.5,1;DP4=0,0,1,8;MQ=60 PL:GT:GQ 96,47,70,35,0,70:1/1:72

    ref = A, alt = T,G right?

    So, genotype may be AA,AT,AG,TT,TG,GG"

    http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9345&highlight=genotype+vcf

    but when I look my results in a genome browser, I find AA,AT,TT,AG,TG,GG for this example instead of AA,AT,AG,TT,TG,GG, unless I'm very much mistaken...
    So, if it's right, I don't understand how samtools/bcftools calculate individual genotype when there are two alternates alleles.. GT and PL fields are in conflict when they allocate a genotype. I give one example :


    Code:
    chrX	3506519		T	G,C 	DP=114;VDB=0.0324;AF1=0.6132;G3=0.4281,3.194e-06,0.5719;HWE=0.00569;AC1=12;DP4=9,15,43,17;MQ=60;FQ=999;PV4=0.0058,1,1,0.39 1/1:173,18,0,173,18,173:6:17    0/1:81,81,81,9,9,0:3:3  0/0:0,24,182,24,182,182:9:19    0/1:0,3,26,3,26,26:1:4  0/1:124,124,124,18,18,0:6:3

    So genotype may be TT, TG, GG, TC, GC, CC

    sample 1 = 1/1:173,18,0,173,18,173:6:17 => this sample is GG...
    sample 2 = 0/1:81,81,81,9,9,0:3:3 => this sample appears CC with the PL, and TG or TC with the GT... and it is GC in my viewer !!
    sample 3 = 0/0:0,24,182,24,182,182:9:19 => this sample is TT
    sample 4 = 0/1:0,3,26,3,26,26:1:4 => this sample appears TT in the PL and the genome browser, so homozygous for the reference allele, but the GT indicate a heterozygous genotype !
    sample 5 = 0/1:124,124,124,18,18,0:6:3 => this sample is CC


    I dont understand.. if somebody can help me, it would be fabulous !

    Thanks,

    Rachel
  • Marie_Noir
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 8

    #2
    I also realized this behaviour of samtools / bcftools and have come across this post:

    http://www.biostars.org/post/show/12...uality-scores/.

    However, I still don't know how to get my genotypes instead :/

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...