Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DESeq without biological replicates (dataset: Marioni et al.)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to use DESeq (version 1.6.1) for differential analysis of the dataset of Marioni et al.
    This dataset contains the counts of 32000 genes sequenced from liver and kidney cells of only one patient. For each condition (liver and kidney), the authors sequenced the samples on different lanes of the machine. This results in replication techniques, but not biological replicates.

    Following the directions of the vignette, I summed the counts of technical replicates of liver and kidney. So, now I have a sample for kidney and a sample for liver, for each gene.

    I'm trying to use the estimateDispersions function with the parameters method="blind" and sharingMode="fit-only".
    By doing so I get a warning: "In parametricDispersionFit(means, disps) : Dispersion fit did not converge."
    If I try to use the estimateDispersions function with the parameters method="blind", sharingMode="fit-only" and also fitType="local", the warning disappears.

    Is this a correct choice of parameters, with this dataset?

    Thanks

  • #2
    Yes, even though the results will still not be very meaningful.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the clarification, Simon.

      So fitType="local" may be safely used when fitType="parametric" does not fails?

      My doubt is because in the vignette (chapter "Working without Any replicates") you don't sum the counts of the pasilla dataset, but you arbitrarily choose to use only two samples (one per condition).
      You make this choice to "simulate" a dataset in which there isn't any kind of replicates?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Andrea Apolloni View Post
        So fitType="local" may be safely used when fitType="parametric" does not fails?
        Yes. This is what the warning recommends, and, actually, I am not even sure yet which fit type I'd prefer.

        My doubt is because in the vignette (chapter "Working without Any replicates") you don't sum the counts of the pasilla dataset, but you arbitrarily choose to use only two samples (one per condition).
        You make this choice to "simulate" a dataset in which there isn't any kind of replicates?
        Exactly.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Genetic Variation in Immunogenetics and Antibody Diversity
          by seqadmin



          The field of immunogenetics explores how genetic variations influence immune responses and susceptibility to disease. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, Oscar Rodriguez, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Louisville, and Ruben Martínez Barricarte, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine at Vanderbilt University, shared recent advancements in immunogenetics. This article discusses their research on genetic variation in antibody loci, antibody production processes,...
          11-06-2024, 07:24 PM
        • seqadmin
          Choosing Between NGS and qPCR
          by seqadmin



          Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) are essential techniques for investigating the genome, transcriptome, and epigenome. In many cases, choosing the appropriate technique is straightforward, but in others, it can be more challenging to determine the most effective option. A simple distinction is that smaller, more focused projects are typically better suited for qPCR, while larger, more complex datasets benefit from NGS. However,...
          10-18-2024, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 11-08-2024, 11:09 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 11-08-2024, 06:13 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 11-01-2024, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        32 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 10-30-2024, 05:31 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X