Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vivienne_lovely
    Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 20

    Problems with running Quake

    Hi, I am new to this area and I am currently working on Highseq data analysis.There are some problems with running quake. I have this output from the software Quake:

    terminate called after throwing an instance of 'mapped_file::ErrorMMap'
    what(): Can't open file '/Quake/bin/test/a.dbm':
    /bin/sh: line 1: 29698 Aborted /Quake/bin/jellyfish qdump -c /Quake/bin/test/a.dbm > a.list.qcts
    Optimization of distribution likelihood function to choose k-mer cutoff failed. Very likely you have set the value of k too high or not provided adequate coverage (>15x). Inspect the k-mer counts for a clear separation of the error and true k-mer distributions.
    Guessing quality values are on ascii 64 scale
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "./quake.py", line 287, in ?
    main()
    File "./quake.py", line 124, in main
    cutoff = get_cutoff()
    File "./quake.py", line 163, in get_cutoff
    exit(1)
    TypeError: 'str' object is not callable

    I changed the value of K,but the problem still there. I do not know how to solve this problem.
    Thanks for anyone that could help.
  • dcopetti
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 2

    #2
    I had several different problems using Quake, and when I got your error it was due to a wrong guessing of the ascii scale. Try using -q parameter (it should be in 33 scale in your case) when you use quake.py, or count-qmers and correct commands.
    I hope this helps!

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    24 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...