Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tomi
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 12

    BWA Combined Reference vs sequential alignment

    Hi,

    I am currently developing a pipeline for novel viral detection and I am using BWA for filtering the mapped sequnces.

    I recognized during my tests that I have a different number of unmapped reads after I align my sample against the whole genome once, in contrast to if I align each chromosome seperately and pipe the output.

    Is this causing BWA heuristically concept, that I get a different number of mapped sequences by using the same references? Is this normal?

    What is better, to align chromosome by chromosome or to align the whole genome at once?

    Would be pelased if anyone could help.
  • swbarnes2
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 910

    #2
    If you align against each chromosome individually, you will have some reads that ought to align to a different chromosome being forced to align to the chromosome you gave it. So the same read will align to multiple chromosomes, and would be counted multiple times. Does that explain what you are seeing?

    It's definately better to give the aligner the whole reference sequence, so the aligner can find the best match, the real match for each read, rather than the best match of the sequences you gave it. Sure, it takes more memory, and more time, but that's what it takes.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...