Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AMacFadyen
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 2

    #1

    A Problem with Short Reads in Newbler

    Hi all,

    Just looking for some help with performing de novo assemblies with Newbler.

    We've sequenced our genome using Illumina and have a 200 bp paired end library. I want to perform a de novo assembly with the data using Newbler however it fails to assemble.

    I'm uploading both .fastq files, Newbler will index them, acknowledge that I have selected pair-end and then "completes" the assembly but doesn't generate any contigs. The read status error says the reads are too short.

    Given the read lengths are 30 bp they should be sufficient, though I think the preferred is 50. I've tried changing the parameters to compensate for 30 bp read lengths but with no luck.

    Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

    Alison
  • nickloman
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 355

    #2
    Why do you want to use Newbler? As the in-house assembler from Roche this is not a natural choice for Illumina data, except for when you are combining Illumina reads with 454 data. Even if it does work, it's likely suboptimal. I'd try a short read assembler instead, any of the ones listed here are probably reasonable choices, except ALLPATHS-LG which isn't compatible with your dataset: http://gage.cbcb.umd.edu/assemblers/index.html
    Last edited by nickloman; 01-21-2012, 09:13 AM.

    Comment

    • nickloman
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 355

      #3
      Also, prepare to be disappointed with the results of a de novo assembly generated with 30bp reads, even if paired.

      Comment

      • AMacFadyen
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 2

        #4
        I've got 454 data that is being used as a reference for 3 other genomes that were sequenced using Illumina. We have Illumina data for the reference genome as well and I've tried doing the assembly by combining this with the 454 and it still gives me the same error. Doing the assembly with the Illumina and 454 data for the reference would be handy but currently my priority is getting an assembly for the Illumina data sets (or at least one of them). I'd like to use just one assembler for all the data which is why I wanted to use Newbler.

        I'll have a look at one of the ones listed as well. It'll give me something at least.

        Thanks for the information.

        Comment

        • nickloman
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 355

          #5
          According to Lex Nederbragt's excellent blog, Newbler has a minimum length for reads of 50bp and a default minimum overlap of 40bp, which is probably the reason you don't have any luck combining the data. For hybrid Illumina/454 assemblies it might be worth reducing those values so the short reads are used (see http://contig.wordpress.com/2011/04/...-read-contigs/).

          If you just want to use the Illumina reads, a de Bruijn graph based short-read assembler will likely perform much better (the overlap-layout-consensus method used by Newbler isn't tailored for large numbers of very short reads).

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          40 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          41 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...