Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ruc9
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 3

    #1

    Tophat~Error retrieving prep_reads info

    Hi, everyone.

    I got the problem below when I was running tophat on a RNAseq data.
    The error message are below:

    rui@:~/RNAseq$ tophat -p 20 --solexa-quals ~/reference/bowtie_ref/hg19bowtieidx /home/NGS/Sample_RNAseq49T/RNAseq49T_NoIndex_L001_R1_001.fastq /home/NGS/Sample_RNAseq49T/RNAseq49T_NoIndex_L001_R2_002.fastq

    [Tue Jan 24 13:34:59 2012] Beginning TopHat run (v1.4.0)
    -----------------------------------------------
    [Tue Jan 24 13:34:59 2012] Preparing output location ./tophat_out/
    [Tue Jan 24 13:34:59 2012] Checking for Bowtie index files
    [Tue Jan 24 13:34:59 2012] Checking for reference FASTA file
    [Tue Jan 24 13:34:59 2012] Checking for Bowtie
    Bowtie version: 0.12.7.0
    [Tue Jan 24 13:34:59 2012] Checking for Samtools
    Samtools Version: 0.1.18
    [Tue Jan 24 13:34:59 2012] Generating SAM header for /home/rui/reference/bowtie_ref/hg19bowtieidx
    format: fastq
    quality scale: solexa33 (reads generated with GA pipeline version < 1.3)
    [Tue Jan 24 13:35:02 2012] Preparing reads
    left reads: min. length=100, count=3964145
    [FAILED]
    Error retrieving prep_reads info.

    Does anybody know what happened?

    Thanks a lot.

    Rui
  • Ambily
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 6

    #2
    Did you figure a way around this error ?

    I have also been getting the same error for some few cases while the rest of them ran without any issues.

    I would appreciate any pointers regarding this.

    Comment

    • ruc9
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 3

      #3
      Hi, Ambily.

      I sent email to the person who write Tophat. And I went back to check my fastq files.

      Since the output still print out the left reads information, my problem is the second reads file is corrupted. It is almost all N's. And this problem may also due to the file format is incorrect. Hope this will give you some help.

      Rui

      Comment

      • Ambily
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2012
        • 6

        #4
        Thank you so much, Rui. I will look into my files once again and see what's wrong.

        Ambily

        Comment

        • Ambily
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 6

          #5
          Hi Rui,

          I looked at my reads and, as you had mentioned, mine contains too many Ns too. So, could you please advise me as to what needs to be done ? Is there some workaround, or should we repeat the experiment itself ?

          Thanks in advance.

          Comment

          • ruc9
            Junior Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 3

            #6
            Hi, Ambily.

            I don't think we can workaround since reads contain too many Ns, even if we can do something, the result may not be reliable. Our lab decide to redo the experiment. I suggest you try to ask somebody else like the person who wrote Tophat, since I am also new to RNAseq analysis.

            Rui

            Comment

            • Ambily
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2012
              • 6

              #7
              Thank you so much, Rui. I will check up with Tophat authors too before I make a final decision. Highly appreciate your prompt response.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2




                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                Today, 06:46 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              14 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              67 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              47 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...