Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rnaeye
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 80

    #1

    please help with .fastaq and .sam format

    Hi guys,
    Following sequences are from .sam file (very left several columns). What I do not understand is what is the meaning of second column at the last two lines. Those are
    1:N:0:ACTTGA and 1:Y:0:ACTTGA.
    I was wondering if anyone can help me with those. Should I ignore these sequences? Thank you very much for you help.

    HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:1554:1975 0 chr 1986354 255 50M * 0 NTAATTGTCTCTGCAATGTTATTAACCATAATATCAATTTCACCGAAACG #1=ADDBBFFFHBAGIGEHIFIHIIICGIIGCHGIIIIHIIIIIFDGIIH XA:i:2
    HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:1612:1993 0 chr 292259 255 50M * 0 ACTGCTAATGAAGTAACACAAATAGATGGCGTGGCGTCAGTTGATGAAAA @@CDFFFFFHHFHHHGIJJIHHIIICIGIIJFHGHHGGHIJEIJBHGIII XA:i:0
    HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:2526:1955 16 chr 135945 255 50M * 0 TCAGTAACGACAGTAAGTTGGCAAGCGACATTAGCCGGTTTAGTAATTGN JJGHFGHIGJJHGGIGDIGIIDJJJJIHHCIJJJJJIHHGHHDFFFD=1# XA:i:1
    HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:3762:1995 1:N:0:ACTTGA 4 * 0 0 * * TTGCTTGTTTACCAATGATTAAAAACCATACTTATTTTCAATTTACTGGA @@CFFFFACFHHHGIIIIJJHHJJJJIJIIJJIIJJJJJIIIJJHIIJJD XM:i:0
    HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:4204:1964 1:Y:0:ACTTGA 4 * 0 0 * * NTGCTAGTCAATTGCTACACCATTTAATTGTGGAAGCAAAAGCTAAAGGT #1DBD+=2CBDDEEEDEIE@FDFEEEEEFEEEIIEDEEA@DDEEDIE? XM:i:0
  • arvid
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 156

    #2
    "1:N:0:ACTTGA" and "1:Y:0:ACTTGA" are not in a second column but part of the read identifiers, since they are separated by a space, and not by a tab as SAM fields are (I had to look at the HTML source to find that out, though). They look like the output from the Illumina pipelines for reads and include the barcode for that read and some other stuff that I'm not sure about.
    Last edited by arvid; 02-01-2012, 07:52 AM.

    Comment

    • chadn737
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 392

      #3
      So two things:

      These reads are aligned, thats why there are genomic coordinates:
      Code:
      HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:1554:1975 0 chr 1986354 255 50M * 0 NTAATTGTCTCTGCAATGTTATTAACCATAATATCAATTTCACCGAAACG #1=ADDBBFFFHBAGIGEHIFIHIIICGIIGCHGIIIIHIIIIIFDGIIH XA:i:2
      HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:1612:1993 0 chr 292259 255 50M * 0 ACTGCTAATGAAGTAACACAAATAGATGGCGTGGCGTCAGTTGATGAAAA @@CDFFFFFHHFHHHGIJJIHHIIICIGIIJFHGHHGGHIJEIJBHGIII XA:i:0
      HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:2526:1955 16 chr 135945 255 50M * 0 TCAGTAACGACAGTAAGTTGGCAAGCGACATTAGCCGGTTTAGTAATTGN JJGHFGHIGJJHGGIGDIGIIDJJJJIHHCIJJJJJIHHGHHDFFFD=1# XA:i:1
      Whereas these are not aligned:

      Code:
      HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:3762:1995 1:N:0:ACTTGA 4 * 0 0 * * TTGCTTGTTTACCAATGATTAAAAACCATACTTATTTTCAATTTACTGGA @@CFFFFACFHHHGIIIIJJHHJJJJIJIIJJIIJJJJJIIIJJHIIJJD XM:i:0
      HWI-ST273:295:C0C4PACXX:7:1101:4204:1964 1:Y:0:ACTTGA 4 * 0 0 * * NTGCTAGTCAATTGCTACACCATTTAATTGTGGAAGCAAAAGCTAAAGGT #1DBD+=2CBDDEEEDEIE@FDFEEEEEFEEEIIEDEEA@DDEEDIE? XM:i:0
      Secondly, these two fields are part of the original read data in the fastq file:
      1:N:0:ACTTGA and 1:Y:0:ACTTGA.
      After Illumina Casava v something or another (1.8?) they made some changes. One of the changes was that reads that did not pass filter were still included in the fastq files, but are flagged with either a 1:N:0:ACTTGA, indicating no, it did not pass filter or a 1:Y:0:ACTTGA, indicating that yes, it did pass filter.

      You should actually sort the fastq files and remove those flagged with a N before alignment. There is a recommended script in the Casava documentation to filter these:

      Code:
      cd /path/to/project/sample
          mkdir filtered
          for fastq in *.fastq.gz ; do zcat $fastq | grep
            -A 4 '^@.* [^:]*:N:[^:]*:' > filtered/$fastq
          ; done
      Last edited by chadn737; 02-01-2012, 08:02 AM.

      Comment

      • rnaeye
        Member
        • May 2011
        • 80

        #4
        Thank you "arvid" and "chadn737". You guys made my day. I very much appreciate your help.
        Best,

        Comment

        • kmcarr
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 1181

          #5
          Originally posted by chadn737 View Post
          After Illumina Casava v something or another (1.8?) they made some changes. One of the changes was that reads that did not pass filter were still included in the fastq files, but are flagged with either a 1:N:0:ACTTGA, indicating no, it did not pass filter or a 1:Y:0:ACTTGA, indicating that yes, it did pass filter.

          You should actually sort the fastq files and remove those flagged with a N before alignment. There is a recommended script in the Casava documentation to filter these:

          Code:
          cd /path/to/project/sample
              mkdir filtered
              for fastq in *.fastq.gz ; do zcat $fastq | grep
                -A 4 '^@.* [^:]*:N:[^:]*:' > filtered/$fastq
              ; done


          chadn,

          There's a slight error in your description. In CASAVA 1.8+ the Y/N means "Is the read filtered", on other words did the read FAIL filtering. This means that reads with Y=failed whereas N=passed. Your code fragment will keep the passed (N) reads which is the desired outcome.

          Confusion is understandable. In versions previous to 1.8 the meaning of the Y/N was reversed, and to my way of thinking more understandable.

          Comment

          • rnaeye
            Member
            • May 2011
            • 80

            #6
            Good to know. Thanks.

            Comment

            • chadn737
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2009
              • 392

              #7
              Originally posted by kmcarr View Post
              chadn,

              There's a slight error in your description. In CASAVA 1.8+ the Y/N means "Is the read filtered", on other words did the read FAIL filtering. This means that reads with Y=failed whereas N=passed. Your code fragment will keep the passed (N) reads which is the desired outcome.

              Confusion is understandable. In versions previous to 1.8 the meaning of the Y/N was reversed, and to my way of thinking more understandable.
              Ah, thanks for the clarification.

              Comment

              • rnaeye
                Member
                • May 2011
                • 80

                #8
                Thanks for making it clear.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                  We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                  ...
                  09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                0 responses
                14 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                0 responses
                21 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                0 responses
                19 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...