Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bgansw
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 24

    #1

    RATT annotation tool help

    Hello,

    I'm new to bioinformatics and am trying to use the RATT annotation tool to transfer annotation from an already sequenced bacterial strain to another very closely related one.

    RATT has run successfully, but I'm not sure how to interpret the results.

    The main target of my project is to find out how many/which genes are common to both the strains and which genes are unique to either of the strains.
    RATT results have generated .final.embl files, .embl files, .report files, .txt files and .mutations.gff files.

    The overview of the results looks like this:
    Overview of transfere of annotation elements:
    3500 elements found.
    2543 Elements were transfered.
    0 Elements could be transfered partially.
    61 Elements split.
    957 Parts of elements (i.e.exons tRNA) not transferred.
    957 Elements couldn't be transferred.

    1.What should I do next? Should I assume that the 2543 genes are found in both the strains?
    2. Should I look at the 957 genes that were not transferred manually to ascertain their presence or absence in both the strains?
    3.Since my query file is the soapdenovo assembly .scafseq file, the sequences are present in the form of 'C' numbers like C12345 and scaffolds 'scaffold 234'. Should I look at the .final.embl files generated (eg C12345.final.emb) and all the C & scaffold numbers that are missing are present only in my query not in the reference genome.
    4. How do I determine the number of genes in my query genome with the help of RATT?

    If theres a better way to use RATT to pick out genes common to both the strains and ascertain total number of genes, please let me know.

    I'd really appreciate any help. Like I said earlier, I'm new to bioinformatics and would be grateful for any help.

    bgansw

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...