Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bgansw
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 24

    RATT annotation tool help

    Hello,

    I'm new to bioinformatics and am trying to use the RATT annotation tool to transfer annotation from an already sequenced bacterial strain to another very closely related one.

    RATT has run successfully, but I'm not sure how to interpret the results.

    The main target of my project is to find out how many/which genes are common to both the strains and which genes are unique to either of the strains.
    RATT results have generated .final.embl files, .embl files, .report files, .txt files and .mutations.gff files.

    The overview of the results looks like this:
    Overview of transfere of annotation elements:
    3500 elements found.
    2543 Elements were transfered.
    0 Elements could be transfered partially.
    61 Elements split.
    957 Parts of elements (i.e.exons tRNA) not transferred.
    957 Elements couldn't be transferred.

    1.What should I do next? Should I assume that the 2543 genes are found in both the strains?
    2. Should I look at the 957 genes that were not transferred manually to ascertain their presence or absence in both the strains?
    3.Since my query file is the soapdenovo assembly .scafseq file, the sequences are present in the form of 'C' numbers like C12345 and scaffolds 'scaffold 234'. Should I look at the .final.embl files generated (eg C12345.final.emb) and all the C & scaffold numbers that are missing are present only in my query not in the reference genome.
    4. How do I determine the number of genes in my query genome with the help of RATT?

    If theres a better way to use RATT to pick out genes common to both the strains and ascertain total number of genes, please let me know.

    I'd really appreciate any help. Like I said earlier, I'm new to bioinformatics and would be grateful for any help.

    bgansw

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...