Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mattia
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 30

    #1

    DESeq Estimate Dispersion

    Hi,
    I'm starting to use DESeq package since few days, so I'm not very practice yet. I would ask two question.
    First ten rows of my data file (TXT format) are presented below:

    X6a X6b
    ENSG00000000003 20 10
    ENSG00000000005 0 0
    ENSG00000000419 542 438
    ENSG00000000457 468 338
    ENSG00000000460 94 81
    ENSG00000000938 19604 14802
    ENSG00000000971 178 151
    ENSG00000001036 559 335
    ENSG00000001084 559 312

    1st question: Is my data file in the right format?
    2nd question:
    I execute these commands:
    >fuv6a6b<-read.table("C:/Programmi/R/R-devel/library/DESeq/FUV6/rawcount6a-6b.txt",header=TRUE,sep="\t",row.names=1)

    >conds <- factor( c( "X6a", "X6b"))

    >cds <- newCountDataSet( fuv6a6b, conds )

    >cds <- estimateSizeFactors( cds )

    >sizeFactors( cds )

    >head( counts( cds, normalized=TRUE ) )

    So far, so good! But when I execute this command (for estimate Variance):

    >cds <- estimateDispersions( cds )

    the program print this error message:
    Error in rowSums(sapply(tapply((1:ncol(counts))[replicated_sample], factor(conditions[replicated_sample]), :
    'x' must be an array of at least two dimensions

    How can I solve this problem?

    Thanks a lot.
    Mattia
    Last edited by mattia; 02-08-2012, 02:58 AM.
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #2
    Dear Mattia

    your problem is that you do not have replicates. DESeq should have stated this in the error message; I have to check why the rather cryptic message appeared instead.

    For you to go ahead, please read the section in the vignette about how to proceed without replicates and also look through the various threads here in SeqAnswers that discuss why your chances of getting any useful results from an RNA-Seq experiment without replication are rather slim.

    Simon

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...