Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • john_nl
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 13

    Combining FPKM values for a gene

    Hello,

    Hopefully this is a simple question that gets a simple answer:

    I just want to map my reads using bowtie to a well defined transcriptome in the form of a cDNA library. This works very nicely, but the problem is that after running it through cufflinks, it gives FPKM values for each transcript isoform that correspond to one gene. Essentially, I want one "score" for each gene- can i just sum FPKM values for each isoform for a given gene?

    ta
  • adamdeluca
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 95

    #2
    You can use the -G option to force cufflinks to only estimate expression of the reference transcripts you supply. Supply 1/gene.

    Comment

    • kopi-o
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 319

      #3
      You should be able to just sum the FPKMs.

      Comment

      • Simon Anders
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 995

        #4
        ARe you sure that cufflinks likes to work on data aligned to the [I]transcriptome[/I[? I suppose you mean by this that you supplied bowtie not with FASTA files for the genome but with files for the tranmscripts. This does not sound like the workflow it is designed for.

        In any case, if you just want to know the expression strength of the genes, would it not be easier to count how many reads fall onto any exon of a given gene, rather than letting cuffdiff deconvolute this into transcripts, and you sum this up again.

        Comment

        • natstreet
          Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 83

          #5
          If you are mapping directly to a transcriptome I would maybe suggest trying RSEM and supplying it with a FASTA file of reference transcripts containing only one isoform per gene. The RSEM paper is here and the website here. RSEM is an R package that uses bowtie as a read mapper by default.

          Comment

          • john_nl
            Member
            • Feb 2012
            • 13

            #6
            Thank you very much for all of your answers. Much appreciated.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              Today, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            51 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            110 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...