I have run bfast on multiple machines with various versions of glibc, so it should work. Have you tried a different machine.
-
-
Hi Nils,
I ran memtest86+ and found 500K errors :-) Bad so i checked all of my 8 RAM blocks and found that only one was faulty. So that is what was causing the strange errors all the time. Now i started a new indexing job and hopefully would end properly.
Case closed :-)
Im sorry for the troubles caused and thanks a lot for the help and time you spent!
CheersComment
-
Great, I am glad you found the problem, which would have impacted more than just BFAST.Comment
-
Yes, but the funny thing is that only BFAST INDEX and sometimes NOVOINDEX were complaining
Anyways the BFAST INDEX is progressing well now and hopefully i will have my index by the end of the day.
Great!
Thanks again!Comment
-
CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).
Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into...07-31-2026, 11:01 AM -
Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.
The systematic characterization of the human proteome has...07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
Comment