Is there any way to exclude the read lengths below certain length say 100bp for denovo assembly using Velvet
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
I don't think there is a way to specify the reads that go into the contigs with velvet (like you can with Newbler). You can specify the minimum contig length in Velvet, but that is not exactly what you wanted. The best thing to do would be to filter the reads before assembly.Originally posted by nxtgenkid10 View PostIs there any way to exclude the read lengths below certain length say 100bp for denovo assembly using Velvet
Out of curiosity, why are you wanting to do this? If your data is 454 then Newbler will probably do a better job, in my experience, and if your data is from an Illumina 100bp library then you are not really going to have any variation in read length.
-
Originally posted by SES View PostI don't think there is a way to specify the reads that go into the contigs with velvet (like you can with Newbler). You can specify the minimum contig length in Velvet, but that is not exactly what you wanted. The best thing to do would be to filter the reads before assembly.
Out of curiosity, why are you wanting to do this? If your data is 454 then Newbler will probably do a better job, in my experience, and if your data is from an Illumina 100bp library then you are not really going to have any variation in read length.
yes i agree with you i have data with newbler am trying out the results with other assemblers too and see the differences; as i'm new to this arena wanna to know how these tools work .. and thank you for responding back
Comment
-
So why don't you trust your reads below 100 bp? (Maybe there's a reason for this).
Velvet uses k-mers, so the reads will be "splitted" into shorter fragments anyways.
Comment
-
The thing is that I'm lokking for the reads with Q30+ and feels it may have some adapter contamination; aS i told before I'm new to this and looking for options in the tools to make an clear interpretation from the data in handOriginally posted by nangillala View PostSo why don't you trust your reads below 100 bp? (Maybe there's a reason for this).
Velvet uses k-mers, so the reads will be "splitted" into shorter fragments anyways.
Comment
-
Hi,Originally posted by nxtgenkid10 View PostThe thing is that I'm lokking for the reads with Q30+ and feels it may have some adapter contamination; aS i told before I'm new to this and looking for options in the tools to make an clear interpretation from the data in hand
I'm not sure what kind of reads you have: Illumina? 454? SFF format? Fastq?
Assuming you have files in fastq format you could use the fastx toolkit
to get rid of adapters (Fastq_Clipper). You can also use it to discard sequences shorter than a threshold you choose.
You may also like the Fastq Quality Filter. You can choose the minimum quality score to keep and the minimum percent of bases that must have this quality.
Hope that helps!?
Comment
-
454 Fastq and thanks that is really helpfulOriginally posted by nangillala View PostHi,
I'm not sure what kind of reads you have: Illumina? 454? SFF format? Fastq?
Assuming you have files in fastq format you could use the fastx toolkit
to get rid of adapters (Fastq_Clipper). You can also use it to discard sequences shorter than a threshold you choose.
You may also like the Fastq Quality Filter. You can choose the minimum quality score to keep and the minimum percent of bases that must have this quality.
Hope that helps!?
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).
Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into...-
Channel: Articles
07-31-2026, 11:01 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
|
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
0 responses
33 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
|
0 responses
37 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
|
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
|
Comment