Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • moriah
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 23

    miRNA proportion in mir-seq

    Hi All,

    I received an Illumina HiSeq output on human mirna-seq and after trimming the adapters and alignment to the genome I realized that only 30% of my reads align to miRNAs while other 70% are tRNA,rRNA and other small RNAs.

    I was wondering whether this miRNA proportion is normal?

    Thanks!
  • Nicolas
    Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 41

    #2
    Hi,

    Did you collapse identical sequences (you should not...)? How did you size-selected your RNA? Which tissues is it from (piRNA are abundant in the germline)?

    Comment

    • moriah
      Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 23

      #3
      No, I didn't collapse and it is from breast tissue (tumor and normal).

      Size selection? What do you mean?
      If you mean the library preparation from total RNA, I don't know.

      Thanks!

      Comment

      • Nicolas
        Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 41

        #4
        The protocol for smallRNA-Seq is not the same as for "classical" RNA-Seq, with the aim of purifying the sample from long RNA and enriching for "smallRNA". At one point, we do run a gel and select for the appropriate size (that might be fly-specific, because there is a very abundant 30nt rRNA in Drosophila).

        Other users' input would be useful here!

        Comment

        • moriah
          Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 23

          #5
          Yes, the protocol for small RNA library preparation was followed. The small RNA where isolated for sure and sequenced. But this low proportion of miRNA in my data is what I am not sure about, is it normal? and if not, where can be the problem?

          Thank you

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          38 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          100 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          121 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
          0 responses
          114 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...